COMMENTARY ON BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION
Bribery and Corruption together is a social problem that has come to
stay with us. It is a negative phenomenon and impinges on the
conscience of many because of its debilitating effects on development.
Bribery and corruption have been cited as the major reason for
the overthrow of governments both military and civilian since
independence. The Anin Commission appointed by the Kutu
Achaempong led National Liberation Council in 1975 defined bribery and
corruption as the giving and receiving of a gift or attempts to extort a
gift or a valuation consideration whether cash or kind with the object
of influencing a person in a position of trust to act in a way favorable
to the interest of the giver. Persons in positions of trust
act according to set of rules either explicitly stated or understood,
so if in the course of exercising such powers any person attempts to
influence their conduct with gifts either in cash or kind such a person
is indulging in bribery since the intent is to corrupt the official.
The Anin Commission further revealed that if the person holding
the position of trust demand a gift from possible beneficiaries in order
to favor them before performing such functions, the trustee is clearly
corrupt. Why should one know someone or have a link with a big
man in order to get what one rightfully deserves.
Sociologically, bribery and corruption are not synonymous terms.
Bribery is narrower, more direct and less subtle.
In fact there cannot be bribe givers without bribe takers, hence the
assertion that the giver is as guilty as the receiver.
Corruption can and frequently does exist even when there are no personal
tempers or guilty confederates. In the assertion of Nye (1967)
the use of reward to pervert the judgment of a person in a position of
trust also constitutes bribery. Empirically if someone in a
high position agrees to help a friend or relative of another person in
an equally high position with the hope of reciprocity, that person is
corrupt. Whichever way one looks at the phenomenon, bribery is
wrong whether it results in the bending of rules or outright violation.
The issue of bribery and corruption is so serious that in most
organizations the bureaucratic principle which requires the
impersonality of inter-personal relation also known as ‘Sine Ire Et
Studio’ in Latin meaning, an act without ill-will, is being violated.
The principle of first come first serve has no prominence anymore
in many places. It is common knowledge that in some
organizations today promotions and selection are no longer the preserve
of technical competence due to bribery and corruption. Sadly
the canker has led to the situation where in some institutions less
educated, low ranked in hierarchy sometimes get comparatively higher
remuneration than more qualified and higher ranked seniors. The
belief that one needs to pay huge sums of money or have a link before
one can get a job has saturated the minds of many young graduates
seeking for jobs and rightfully so. As for what some bosses do
to our young ladies before offering them jobs, only God and the
principal actors know. Admittedly many organizations have
square pegs in round holes and the output is low productivity,
mediocrity and waste of public resources. Why on earth should
we have ghost names on our payrolls? Why should one lobby
before getting an appointment? Or why should it take some
officials over six months and sometimes years to process documents for
payment of newly enrolled nurses or appointed teachers when people are
being paid to do that as their job description. The fight
against bribery and corruption must therefore be taken more seriously
bearing in mind that until the root causes are identified and nipped in
the bud, we may only be joking. The fight must tackle both the
precipitating and perpetuating factors squarely.
The socialization of Ghanaians which make us feel and believe that we
have a prescriptive or even a God-given right to depend on brothers,
sisters, cousins, uncles and other relatives for all kinds of help play a
role in corruption and must be given a second look . Also
supervisors of administrative controls and the suppression of moral
courage in the name of preserving good social relations should be
reconsidered. Religious leaders must intensify the crusade
against the pervasive acquisition on the get rich quick syndrome by
first discouraging expensive funerals and marriages. Bribery
and corruption has the potential of making our nation unattractive to
visitors. It kills many psychologically and widens the social
class gap making the richer ever richer and the poor ever poorer.
Bribe givers and takers as well as those who engage in all sorts of
corrupt acts must the reminded that no condition is permanent.
They may succeed today but judgment surely awaits us all. A
word to the wise, we have long been told is enough.
BY GEORGE ASEKRE OF GBC, RADIO NEWSROOM.
COMMENTARY ON CONDEMNING ATTACKS ON JOURNALISTS IN THE COURSE OF THEIR WORK.
If lots were cast today for the most admired journalist in Ghana, it will surely fall on Ace investigative journalist, Anas Aremeyaw Anas. This is because Anas succeeded in carrying out his duties without any physical attack. It is possible that the very people who praise Anas today would have been the very first to condemn and call for his head if he had been arrested, attacked or harmed in the course of his duties. Like the Biblical Pharisees, the truth about Ghanaians is that, they will praise you if you win and betray you if you are handicapped. Thank God Anas is safe.
Article 162 Clause 4 of the 1992 constitution states that editors and publishers of newspapers and other institutions of the Mass Media shall not be subject to control or interference by government nor shall they be penalized or harassed for their editorial opinions and views for the content of their publication.
Whilst Ghanaian journalists can freely work without fear of governmental interference and harassments, the same cannot be said of individuals and security agencies. Attacks on journalists in the course of their work are not new at least, to people in the inky fraternity. It is not true that attacks on journalists prevailed only in the era of military rule. Journalists have been attacked even under democratically elected Presidents in Ghana.
Not too long ago, some journalists were attacked, vilified and abused by security men of former President Kufour at his Private residence in Accra. After that incident, a camera man of the state television, GTV, was assaulted in Accra in the course of duty. Before condemnations of that attack could end, another journalist with the State Radio, Radio Ghana, was attacked by uniformed Policemen in Tamale during the district level elections. As if there was a perpetual attempt to frustrate journalists, another group of Policemen on February 8, 2011 attacked and assaulted a reporter and a cameraman of TV3 at Ofankor in Accra when they were lawfully carrying out their duties.
The list is endless. Nobody doubts the crucial role journalists have played in bringing Ghana this far. The sad aspect of the story is that these journalists were attacked whilst trying to expose some wrongs in society in accordance with the laws of Ghana. The GBC and TV3 journalists in particular acted in line with Article 12 section one of the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) Code of Ethics which states that, a journalist shall obtain information, photographs and illustrations only by straightforward means. Besides, section two of Article 12 of the same GJA Code of Ethics says that, the use of other means can be justified only by overriding considerations of the public interest.
The attacks on these journalists are therefore unjustified, barbaric and must be condemned in no certain terms. In fact they must not be allowed to continue in Ghana where the doors of justice are open. It is high time the Ghana Journalists Association started biting after years of barking. If lawyers jumped in to defend Amina accused of causing fear & panic over the mass sex allegation why can’t the same be extended to journalists? What is our priority as a nation? Has the National Media Commission forgotten that it has a mandate under Article 167(a) of the 1992 constitution to promote and ensure the freedom and independence of the media for mass communication? How long will the Police Administration continue to allow a few irresponsible policemen to continue to frustrate journalists?
Maybe the time has come for media owners to start taking legal action against people who attack their workers after all, it is not wrong for the mountain to go to Mohamed if Mohammed fails to go to the mountain. Enemies of journalists should bear in mind that a war against media practitioners is tantamount to fetching water with a basket. In fact no weapon fashioned against journalists shall prosper here in Ghana.
Yesterday it was GBC, today it is TV3, tomorrow it could be another, so let us all help protect our journalists.
BY: GEORGE ASEKERE OF GBC RADIO NEWS, ACCRA.
If lots were cast today for the most admired journalist in Ghana, it will surely fall on Ace investigative journalist, Anas Aremeyaw Anas. This is because Anas succeeded in carrying out his duties without any physical attack. It is possible that the very people who praise Anas today would have been the very first to condemn and call for his head if he had been arrested, attacked or harmed in the course of his duties. Like the Biblical Pharisees, the truth about Ghanaians is that, they will praise you if you win and betray you if you are handicapped. Thank God Anas is safe.
Article 162 Clause 4 of the 1992 constitution states that editors and publishers of newspapers and other institutions of the Mass Media shall not be subject to control or interference by government nor shall they be penalized or harassed for their editorial opinions and views for the content of their publication.
Whilst Ghanaian journalists can freely work without fear of governmental interference and harassments, the same cannot be said of individuals and security agencies. Attacks on journalists in the course of their work are not new at least, to people in the inky fraternity. It is not true that attacks on journalists prevailed only in the era of military rule. Journalists have been attacked even under democratically elected Presidents in Ghana.
Not too long ago, some journalists were attacked, vilified and abused by security men of former President Kufour at his Private residence in Accra. After that incident, a camera man of the state television, GTV, was assaulted in Accra in the course of duty. Before condemnations of that attack could end, another journalist with the State Radio, Radio Ghana, was attacked by uniformed Policemen in Tamale during the district level elections. As if there was a perpetual attempt to frustrate journalists, another group of Policemen on February 8, 2011 attacked and assaulted a reporter and a cameraman of TV3 at Ofankor in Accra when they were lawfully carrying out their duties.
The list is endless. Nobody doubts the crucial role journalists have played in bringing Ghana this far. The sad aspect of the story is that these journalists were attacked whilst trying to expose some wrongs in society in accordance with the laws of Ghana. The GBC and TV3 journalists in particular acted in line with Article 12 section one of the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) Code of Ethics which states that, a journalist shall obtain information, photographs and illustrations only by straightforward means. Besides, section two of Article 12 of the same GJA Code of Ethics says that, the use of other means can be justified only by overriding considerations of the public interest.
The attacks on these journalists are therefore unjustified, barbaric and must be condemned in no certain terms. In fact they must not be allowed to continue in Ghana where the doors of justice are open. It is high time the Ghana Journalists Association started biting after years of barking. If lawyers jumped in to defend Amina accused of causing fear & panic over the mass sex allegation why can’t the same be extended to journalists? What is our priority as a nation? Has the National Media Commission forgotten that it has a mandate under Article 167(a) of the 1992 constitution to promote and ensure the freedom and independence of the media for mass communication? How long will the Police Administration continue to allow a few irresponsible policemen to continue to frustrate journalists?
Maybe the time has come for media owners to start taking legal action against people who attack their workers after all, it is not wrong for the mountain to go to Mohamed if Mohammed fails to go to the mountain. Enemies of journalists should bear in mind that a war against media practitioners is tantamount to fetching water with a basket. In fact no weapon fashioned against journalists shall prosper here in Ghana.
Yesterday it was GBC, today it is TV3, tomorrow it could be another, so let us all help protect our journalists.
BY: GEORGE ASEKERE OF GBC RADIO NEWS, ACCRA.